top of page

Urban Sprawl and City Planning

Focus: Speaking Part 3

Interactive Lesson


Topic Overview

Urban Sprawl and City Planning: Vocabulary for Modern Metropolises

Why This Topic is Crucial for Your IELTS Exam

The theme of urban sprawl, alongside broader topics like city development and quality of life, is highly common across the IELTS modules.

You are likely to encounter this subject in:

  • Writing Task 2: Essays asking about the causes and effects of horizontal expansion vs. vertical living, or solutions for traffic congestion.

  • Speaking Part 3: Debates on government policy regarding land use, public transport, and housing infrastructure.

To achieve a Band 7+, you need precise, academic language to discuss the complex socio-economic and environmental trade-offs inherent in city planning.


Two Points of View: Analyzing the Debate

City planning often involves a conflict between the desire for space and the need for efficiency. Here are the two main perspectives you can use in your essays.


Viewpoint 1: The Case for Suburban Expansion (Space & Quality of Life)

  • Argument: Many families prefer living outside the city center to access affordable housing, larger gardens, and quieter neighborhoods. Restricting growth can drive up house prices, making the city unaffordable for average workers.

  • Key Concept: Horizontal growth (Sprawl) is often a result of people seeking a better socio-economic standard of living.

  • Vocabulary in Action: "Proponents argue that expanding into the suburbs is necessary to provide affordable housing, as the city center has become too expensive for young families."


Viewpoint 2: The Case for Compact Cities (Sustainability)

  • Argument: Urban sprawl is environmentally disastrous. It destroys farmland (Green belts), increases reliance on cars (worsening traffic congestion), and strains public funds because building new infrastructure (pipes, roads) for distant suburbs is expensive.

  • Key Concept: Cities should build up (skyscrapers/apartments), not out.

  • Vocabulary in Action: "Critics argue that we must prioritize sustainable urbanization by densifying existing areas rather than destroying nature to build low-density housing."


Boost Your Lexical Resource: 6 Key Vocabulary Words

To express nuanced ideas about urban growth and planning challenges, integrate these advanced terms into your vocabulary:

  • Urban sprawl (Noun Phrase)

    • Definition: The uncontrolled expansion of urban areas into surrounding low-density, typically rural, areas.

    • Example: "Urban sprawl leads to longer commutes and greater energy consumption as people move further from the city center."

  • Infrastructure (Noun)

    • Definition: The basic physical and organizational structures (e.g., roads, utilities, water supply) needed for a society to operate effectively.

    • Example: "Governments must invest heavily in infrastructure to support rapidly expanding suburbs."

  • Green belt (Noun Phrase)

    • Definition: An area of open land near a city where building is strictly limited, intended to prevent the outward growth of the city.

    • Example: "Activists are campaigning to protect the city's green belt from new housing developments."

  • Sustainable urbanization (Noun Phrase)

    • Definition: The process of developing cities in a way that minimizes environmental impact while ensuring social and economic well-being for all residents.

    • Example: "Sustainable urbanization requires building upwards, not just outwards, to preserve natural land."

  • Traffic congestion (Noun Phrase)

    • Definition: Severe overcrowding of vehicles in an area, causing slow-moving or stationary traffic.

    • Example: "Traffic congestion remains the biggest daily complaint for many city dwellers."

  • Socio-economic (Adjective)

    • Definition: Relating to or concerned with the interaction of social and economic factors.

    • Example: "Socio-economic disparity is often worsened by poor public transport planning that isolates low-income communities."


IELTS Practice

IELTS Speaking Part 3: Strategic Breakdown

In Part 3, the examiner is testing your ability to discuss abstract ideas, evaluate social trends, and speculate about the future. Here is how to tackle the specific questions regarding city planning.


Question 1: Why do you think so many people are moving away from city centers to the suburbs?

Why this Question is Important

This question tests your ability to analyze causes and explain social trends. The examiner wants to see if you can articulate the "Push and Pull" factors (what pushes people out of the city and what pulls them to the countryside) rather than just giving a personal anecdote.


Suggested Strategies

  • The "Push/Pull" Method: Structure your answer by first discussing the negatives of the city (high cost, noise) and then the positives of the suburbs (space, nature).

  • Focus on Cost vs. Quality: Use the term Socio-economic to explain that housing prices in the city center often force middle-income families to move out.

  • Mention the Trade-off: Acknowledge that while they gain space, they lose time due to commuting. This is the perfect place to use the term Urban sprawl.

  • Structure:

    1. Direct Answer: "It's primarily driven by cost and quality of life."

    2. Elaboration: Explain that city centers are becoming unaffordable.

    3. Result: Families move out to find affordable housing, contributing to urban sprawl.


Question 2: Some cities have banned cars from their centers. Do you think this is a good solution for traffic congestion?

Why this Question is Important

This tests your ability to evaluate a policy. It forces you to look at a solution and discuss its effectiveness and consequences. It checks if you can use language of concession (e.g., "While this helps X, it causes Y...").


Suggested Strategies

  • Evaluate Feasibility: Don't just say "Yes." Argue that banning cars only works if there is good public transport.

  • Use Conditionals: "If the city has excellent infrastructure like subways, then banning cars works. If not, it just causes chaos."

  • Discuss the Benefits: Mention the reduction in traffic congestion and pollution.

  • Structure:

    1. Opinion: "In principle, yes, but it depends on the alternatives."

    2. Support: It creates cleaner cities.

    3. Caveat: However, without reliable public transport infrastructure, it unfairly impacts those who need to travel for work.


Question 3: How do you think cities will change in the next 50 years?

Why this Question is Important

This is a speculation question. It tests your ability to use future tenses (e.g., "will likely," "is predicted to," "we might see") and discuss hypothetical scenarios. Examiners look for imagination and the ability to project current trends forward.


Suggested Strategies

  • Vertical vs. Horizontal: Discuss the shift from Urban sprawl (outwards) to vertical living (skyscrapers) to save space.

  • Focus on Ecology: Use the term Sustainable urbanization to describe cities that grow their own food or generate their own power.

  • Avoid "Flying Cars": Keep your predictions grounded in current trends (e.g., smart cities, AI traffic management) rather than science fiction.

  • Structure:

    1. General Prediction: "I believe cities will become much denser and greener."

    2. Detail: We will see more vertical gardens and strict protections for the green belt.

    3. Conclusion: The focus will shift entirely to sustainability.

Example Answers

Model Answers: Applying the Strategies

Question 1: Why do you think so many people are moving away from city centers to the suburbs?

(Strategy Applied: The "Push/Pull" Method)


Answer: "I believe this trend is primarily driven by socio-economic factors. On one hand, the 'push' factor is the skyrocketing cost of living in city centers, which prices out many young families. On the other hand, the 'pull' factor is the desire for a higher quality of life—more space, gardens, and safety—which is only available in the suburbs. Unfortunately, this migration contributes significantly to urban sprawl, as it forces cities to expand outwards, increasing the strain on existing infrastructure like highways and train lines."


Question 2: Some cities have banned cars from their centers. Do you think this is a good solution for traffic congestion?

(Strategy Applied: Evaluate Feasibility / Conditional)


Answer: "In principle, I think it is an excellent initiative for promoting sustainable urbanization. Removing cars undeniably solves the issue of traffic congestion and improves air quality immediately. However, its success is entirely dependent on the alternatives available. If a city lacks robust public transport infrastructure—like reliable subways or buses—banning cars will simply isolate businesses and frustrate residents. So, it is a good solution, provided that the government invests in alternatives first."


Question 3: How do you think cities will change in the next 50 years?

(Strategy Applied: Speculation & Vertical vs. Horizontal)


Answer: "I predict that we will see a major shift away from horizontal expansion and towards vertical density. Because land is becoming scarce and we need to protect the green belt, cities will likely stop spreading out and start building up. We are likely to see a focus on sustainable urbanization, where skyscrapers include vertical gardens and renewable energy sources. Essentially, the city of the future will probably be more compact and walkable, designed to minimize the need for cars entirely."

bottom of page