Public Funding for Art has seen a dramatic decrease in many countries around the world as government budgets can no longer afford to invest in public art. Some argue this is necessary, while others argue communities will suffer long term consequences. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

In today’s polarizing atmosphere, most topics are debated intensely, with public funding for art being no exception. Amidst the discourse regarding this topic, some contend that budgets can no longer afford to handle such needless spending, while at the same time, others claim that communities will lose a sense of value. This essay will explicitly demonstrate that public funding of art is no longer applicable on the basis that budgets face severe shortages of resources and money ought to go towards more useful programs.

Over the past ten years, communities around the globe have faced budget shortfalls, with a surprising amount even committing bankruptcy. While the causes of this are outside the scope of this essay, one of the massive repercussions of these shortcomings is communities are faced with tough decisions on how to property and efficiently spend the money within their budgets. Programs such as social welfare, police and fire, and school fund ought to take priority over programs like art.

These programs form the backbone of society and are greatly needed for the general wellbeing of the current as well as the future generations. Although, it is true that art generates some social value within certain sectors of communities. Without children being educated, policeman arresting criminals, and families eating, these government grants that fund art are a waste of valuable resources.

With all things considered, the most promising result for rectifying the issue of government funding of art programs is to defund any those programs. The preponderance of evidence ranging from a general lack of funds available for such programs to how resources should be better spent within communities, highlight the clear need to implement such an effective measure. In light of the argument laid out above, it is hoped that this discussion moves into the public realm in order to progress the movement forward.