Task 2: Agree/Disagree 1

Interactive Lesson
Tips & Examples
When given an agree and disagree essay the candidate will be asked to discuss agreeing and disagreeing sides of a topic.
Introduction
- Introduce the topic
- Focus on the question
- Thesis Statement/Preview the question
Body Paragraph 1 Agree
- Topic sentence
- Supporting Sentence (Point 1)
Explanation/Example
- Supporting Sentence (Point 2)
Explanation/Example
- Concluding sentence
Body Paragraph 2 Disagree
- Topic sentence
- Supporting Sentence (Point 1)
Explanation/Example
- Supporting Sentence (Point 2)
Explanation/Example
- Concluding sentence
Conclusion
- Restate Thesis (Give opinion if asked)
- Restate main points
- Give a prediction or suggestion
Political movements across the world have been calling for the abolition of the death penalty referring to how cruel it is to execute another human being. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
The subject of punishment is a contentious topic. This is a multi-faceted issue and one that has a multitude of solutions. Yet, one of the most deliberated is that of the death penalty. A particular percentage of the population argues that this policy would contribute significantly to decreasing crime and this paper certainly disagrees with this proclamation. This is due to the lack of evidence surrounding this issue with specifically highlighting that of there is no proof demonstrating that the threat of death is an effective deterrent for criminal activity.
When an individual performs a crime, most are unaware of the possible consequences in committing such an action, and this is especially true of those who commit “blue collar crimes”. The majority of criminal activity in most countries is classified as using this term, and it simply means that these activities are done by people on the lower end of the socio-economic spectrum. The overwhelming majority of these criminals do not engage in crime to outsmart police forces, they commit these crimes out of necessity for survival, or other external force.
Thus, the death penalty, even when clearly marked as a probable penalty for such viscous acts as murder, do not persuade individuals from committing murder. Most of these people act on short-term impulses rather than on long-term, calculated plans, thereby making the death penalty an ineffective deterrent for crime.
With all things considered, the most promising result for rectifying the issue of crime is to unequivocally disapprove of the death penalty. The preponderance of evidence principally focused on the short-term based actions of most criminals, highlights the clear need to reject such an ineffective measure. In light of the argument laid out above, it is hoped that this discussion moves into the public realm in order to progress the movement forward.
